The Fed Is Out of Bullets.

Three dissenters. $40 trillion. No good options.

Dear Reader,

Yesterday, the Federal Reserve released its meeting minutes from July 28-29. Three Fed presidents voted to raise rates right then and there. "Many" participants said hikes would be "likely necessary" if inflation does not cool. Meanwhile, the U.S. national debt is marching past $39 trillion, approaching $40 trillion for the first time in history.

Now run the math. Higher rates mean higher interest payments on that debt. Net interest spending already jumped $117 billion this fiscal year, a 14% increase in a single year. If the Fed hikes, that number gets worse. So do they fight inflation or do they protect the budget? They cannot do both. That is the trap they just confessed to in their own minutes.

Inside today's issue:

THE FED IS OUT OF BULLETS

THE MINUTES DO NOT LIE.

On August 19, the Federal Reserve released its internal record of the July 28-29 meeting. Here is the exact language: "Many participants assessed that policy tightening would likely be necessary if inflation did not decline."

Three presidents voted to hike right then: Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, Lorie Logan. The first three-way same-direction dissent since September 2016. Reuters reported it as a hawkish signal. Bloomberg called it a divided committee.

I call it a confession.

Here is the problem the Fed will not say out loud. Interest payments on the national debt are up $117 billion this fiscal year, a 14% jump in twelve months. That is at current rates of 3.50% to 3.75%. Every quarter-point hike piles more onto that number. The CBO confirmed it: spending rose 5% this year while revenues rose only 3%. The gap is covered by borrowing. More borrowing means more interest. More interest means the Fed cannot afford to be the Fed.

I have watched this movie before. Every empire eventually reaches this moment. Rome debased its silver coins when it could not pay its armies. Weimar ran its presses when it could not pay its war debts. Nixon closed the gold window in 1971 because he could not pay in gold anymore.

The script is always the same. When a government cannot afford sound money, it chooses unsound money. The Fed is at that crossroads. Three members see it clearly and want to hike. The majority cannot afford to. That is not a hawkish committee. That is a committee that has already surrendered and is just looking for the right moment to announce it.

Gold has been giving you the signal for two years. It hit $5,589 in January. It pulled back. It is now back above $4,400. The market is pricing in exactly what the Fed just confessed: inflation is sticky, rates are capped by debt, and the dollar is the loser in every scenario.

But here is the number I want to show you before we continue. It changes how you should think about where we are in this cycle.


Just days ago, Robert Kiyosaki posted something on X that 443,000 people saw.

Most financial gurus tell you what to do. Robert Kiyosaki tells you what HE'S doing.

Just days ago, he posted this to 443,000 people: "During this last 'retracement' or 'crash' I bought more gold and silver." Not "you should buy." Not "consider buying." Not "this might be a good time." "I bought more."

That's the difference between talkers and doers. While everyone else panicked, Robert bought.

"Gold and silver are going to the moon!!!!"

He's putting his money where his mouth is. Now he's revealing ONE opportunity — a streaming company that could deliver 3X-5X silver's gains — so you can do the same. Talk is cheap.

Click here to see the details


That number is the gold-silver ratio. Right now, gold is around $4,430 and silver is around $64. The ratio is roughly 69:1. The long-term historical average is closer to 47:1.

That spread has only been this wide a handful of times in modern history. Each time, it closed in one direction: silver surged. At a 47:1 ratio with gold at $4,400, silver would be around $94 an ounce. That is not a prediction. That is a historical calibration.

Here is my simple thesis. The Fed is caught between two bad options. Option one: raise rates aggressively, break the debt service math, and trigger a fiscal crisis. Option two: hold or cut, let inflation run, and watch the dollar slowly die. In either scenario, hard assets win. In scenario two, they win faster.

I am not predicting a collapse tomorrow. I am reading the Fed's own words back to you. "Many participants" already know they need to hike. They are not hiking because the debt says they cannot. That is a system under strain. Not tomorrow's problem. Today's problem.

What do you do with that? The same thing you do when the referee admits the game is rigged. You stop playing by their rules. Gold, silver, real assets, business ownership. These are not investments. They are exits.

The Fed gave you its honest diagnosis yesterday. Inflation is not dead. Rates are capped by debt. The dollar is being slowly consumed.

I have been carrying gold since before most people knew what a fiat currency was. I will keep carrying it. Not because I am a gold bug. Because I know how this story ends.

To your freedom,

Robert Kiyosaki

Author, Rich Dad Poor Dad

P.S. Before I write about a mine, I go stand in it. I have walked gold mines and lithium mines with Marin Katusa. Boots on the ground is the standard at this company, and Marin is the reason it holds. Over $2 billion in private financings arranged. A New York Times bestseller on finance. Bob Byrne and Tim Collins run institutional-grade due diligence on every deal before it reaches you. Most deals do not pass. The 136X Gold Miner passed. Twice. Once before the first window, and again before we would put our name on a reopen. CLICK TO SEE WHAT THE TEAM FOUND